Comments on: 2008 Stats and Traces

By: scott

scott — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:27:59 +0000

Dave — yes, plenty of blank areas close to home…

In a way the difficulty/effort does account for technical, in that the steeper a trail is, the more technical it is likely to be. But, no, there’s no technical rating in there.

By: Dave Harris

Dave Harris — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:26:47 +0000

Lots of blank spots on those maps! Those are the places that intrigue in my backyard.

As for the effort index, I’m sure that’s not taking into account technical difficulty – is it? Straight GPS stats are gonna miss the meat of yer riding

By: P.D.

P.D. — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:42:12 +0000

Sweet… log book. Another great feathure of Topofusion! Thanks for the idea. Shoddy data for last year, but something to think about for next.

By: scott

scott — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:37:31 +0000

Marshal, looks like you climb more per mile than I do. Not surprising given where you live. Not much flat riding along the front range.

Looks like you GPS a lot of your rides. Cool.

Jenyjo – Yep, I can’t stop staring at those maps. The movement patterns of an obsessed MTB nut. Would love to see some other people’s ‘mental’ maps…

By: Marshal

Marshal — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:35:04 +0000

Interesting, when I looked at my TopoFusion files for 2008 I see about 3050mi, if I manualy add CTR and Trans UT, my elv says about 358,000ft (this elv does not include CTR or rans Ut)and 8 mph avg , very interesting!!