<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garmin Dakota 20 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topofusion.com/diary/2009/12/16/garmin-dakota-20-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topofusion.com/diary/2009/12/16/garmin-dakota-20-review/</link>
	<description>MTB obsession from the author of TopoFusion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:56:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.topofusion.com/diary/2009/12/16/garmin-dakota-20-review/comment-page-1/#comment-68784</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofusion.com/diary/?p=1406#comment-68784</guid>
		<description>@Drey - I would say go with the Dakota over the 60CSx for your uses.

@Gabriel - Upgrade to the latest firmware and you should be good to go.  All the recent ones store HR.  I have mine set to record tracklog at 1 point / second, in case that has anything to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Drey &#8211; I would say go with the Dakota over the 60CSx for your uses.</p>
<p>@Gabriel &#8211; Upgrade to the latest firmware and you should be good to go.  All the recent ones store HR.  I have mine set to record tracklog at 1 point / second, in case that has anything to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.topofusion.com/diary/2009/12/16/garmin-dakota-20-review/comment-page-1/#comment-68764</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofusion.com/diary/?p=1406#comment-68764</guid>
		<description>You say Dakota shows Heart Rate on screen (that&#039;s true) and stores Heart Rate on GPX (that&#039;s not true on firmware 4.7). Could you tell me which version of firmware you tried? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say Dakota shows Heart Rate on screen (that&#8217;s true) and stores Heart Rate on GPX (that&#8217;s not true on firmware 4.7). Could you tell me which version of firmware you tried? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drey</title>
		<link>http://www.topofusion.com/diary/2009/12/16/garmin-dakota-20-review/comment-page-1/#comment-57243</link>
		<dc:creator>Drey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofusion.com/diary/?p=1406#comment-57243</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir.

I just recently sold my eTrex Venture HC opting for a better unit. Choosing between the Dakota 20 vs. the GPSMap60CSX.

My priority is ruggedness as I will be using it most of the time in bike trails where I encounter lots of speed bumps. I am also thinking that the Dakota 20 would be better as it is lighter, cleaner, and newer OS. However, I am already good with the old Garmin OS&#039; which is similar to the eTrex line. The number of buttons is really a good thing for the GPSMap but then its really huge. It&#039;s not nice to carry when navigating in the city e.x. walking in Singapore or Hong Kong. 

Here are my usage. Hoping you could help me out. 
-Hiking
-Pedestrian Commute in the City
-Biking 90% of the time. 

Would the Dakota be fair enough for the job? I fear for the backlight readability, less rugged casing, and the lack of proximity/alarm sounds would dampen the experience. Please enlighten me, I know both are worth upgrading from an old eTrex. 

Sincerely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir.</p>
<p>I just recently sold my eTrex Venture HC opting for a better unit. Choosing between the Dakota 20 vs. the GPSMap60CSX.</p>
<p>My priority is ruggedness as I will be using it most of the time in bike trails where I encounter lots of speed bumps. I am also thinking that the Dakota 20 would be better as it is lighter, cleaner, and newer OS. However, I am already good with the old Garmin OS&#8217; which is similar to the eTrex line. The number of buttons is really a good thing for the GPSMap but then its really huge. It&#8217;s not nice to carry when navigating in the city e.x. walking in Singapore or Hong Kong. </p>
<p>Here are my usage. Hoping you could help me out.<br />
-Hiking<br />
-Pedestrian Commute in the City<br />
-Biking 90% of the time. </p>
<p>Would the Dakota be fair enough for the job? I fear for the backlight readability, less rugged casing, and the lack of proximity/alarm sounds would dampen the experience. Please enlighten me, I know both are worth upgrading from an old eTrex. </p>
<p>Sincerely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ McBride</title>
		<link>http://www.topofusion.com/diary/2009/12/16/garmin-dakota-20-review/comment-page-1/#comment-56692</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofusion.com/diary/?p=1406#comment-56692</guid>
		<description>Hmmm ... yeah, adding an external AA battery pack to the Edge 800 would be easy but you&#039;re adding weight and complexity to the system (places for water to potentially get in, more stuff to lose or break, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8230; yeah, adding an external AA battery pack to the Edge 800 would be easy but you&#8217;re adding weight and complexity to the system (places for water to potentially get in, more stuff to lose or break, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.topofusion.com/diary/2009/12/16/garmin-dakota-20-review/comment-page-1/#comment-56328</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofusion.com/diary/?p=1406#comment-56328</guid>
		<description>For TD something with AA batteries is the only way to go, IMO.  Dakota all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For TD something with AA batteries is the only way to go, IMO.  Dakota all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 243/244 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.topofusion.com @ 2012-02-10 15:41:59 -->
